Solicitor Lisa Gianquitto and Barrister Philip Rule explain the Guittard ruling
In R (Guittard) v Secretary of State for Justice in 2009 the Court found that the Secretary of State (SSJ) failed to exercise his statutory discretion in refusing to conduct an assessment of Mr Guittard’s suitability for a transfer to open conditions, outside of his parole board review. Mr Guittard was an indeterminate public protection prisoner, who was approaching the expiry of his tariff. The Court said that the SSJ had acted unlawfully by refusing to consider the recategorisation and transfer to open conditions, outside of his parole review. The SSJ was also ordered to consider his suitability for a move to open conditions without delay.
The Judge commented that even though the SSJ had accepted that he had the discretion (authority) to consider the transfer of IPP prisoners to open conditions, without a Parole Board review/recommendation, no-one actually knew about this discretion! A change of policy was therefore required.
Following that judgment the Ministry of Justice adopted some informal criteria for considering a move to open conditions outside the usual parole process. In other words, if the Ministry of Justice felt, after reviewing a case, there was merit in a prisoner moving to open conditions this decision could be made administratively, without the need for a hearing. The criteria were:
1. the parole dossier must contain evidence the prisoner has made significant progress;
2. there must be consensus amongst the reports he/she is suitable and safe for open conditions;
3. there are no areas of concern that would benefit from further exploration at an oral hearing;
4. it is demonstrated in the prisoner's representations that there are clear benefits to transfer immediately.
The SSJ put in place unpublished departmental guidance titled “ISP Transfer to Open Conditions”. The guidance adopts criteria for “exceptional” progress justifying such a transfer. These criteria have not been tested in Court as to their reasonableness or legality. The question remains whether the criteria adopted are lawful? Arguably they are not fair criteria for the exercise of the discretion.
The concerns that we have that apply to all Guittard applications include:
(1) Is the unpublished policy consistent with the published policies?
(2) Does the policy adopt an artificially high test and fail to allow proper consideration of the case? The fact that anything may be considered an area of concern is almost inevitably the position when a prisoner is recommended for open conditions by the Board. From experience a failure under this requirement is often cited by the MOJ to refuse an application under Guittard;
(3) Is it logical to set the bar higher than it is for the Parole Board? The Secretary of State refers life sentence and IPP prisoner cases to the Parole Board. Why isn’t an application under Guittard decided on the same factors as those under consideration by the Parole Board?
We are also concerned that some applications are not being properly dealt with by the prison authorities and MOJ; individual cases we have experience of do present further problems which will not apply to all prisoners. A successful application under Guittard will mean that a prisoner will not have to go through the daunting prospect of a parole hearing to get to open conditions. This process, without doubt, saves time, money and Parole Board resources. If a prisoner has an unsuccessful application under Guittard this will not impact upon any subsequent parole hearing. It must be remembered that an application under Guittard and an application to the Parole Board run alongside one another.
A prisoner does not need to use the same solicitors for the parole process as the Guittard process as, although they run alongside one another, they are separate and distinct processes. If you feel your case may warrant an application under the Guittard principles, or you have been refused a transfer to open conditions and wish to know whether you can challenge that in court, please contact Lisa Gianquitto, consultant for Carringtons Solicitors who can provide advice and where necessary obtain counsel’s opinion to assist you.
Lisa Gianquitto, consultant solicitor for Carringtons Solicitors
Philip Rule, barrister specialising in prison law and criminal law, Castle Chambers
Comments about this article
There are no comments, be the first to leave one!
Confusion in his mind
The 2012 Longford Lecture goes down a storm
Prison, rehabilitation and slavery
Dial M for Murdoch
Bob Woffinden writes...
The history of public protection from offenders
Opened in error
Current page: Guittard applications
The Association for Prison Lawyers 5th Anniversary
Donít let recall ruin Christmas
Funding an appeal
Month by Month
In the Spotlight - Prison Chat UK
Who am I
Nipping criminality in the bud
Jonathan King writes
Cutting the roots of destructive behaviour
From over the wall
October 2014 Headlines
Koestler Awards 2014
Police visit National Prison Radio
Parole Board Update
The right to work
Month by Month - October 2014
Inside without Faith
Justice Select Committee
The longest Journey
Our own version of Islam is being blocked, fettered and stonewalled
For the love of cooking
Prison compensation unfair?
The Merchant of Venice
Raising learners voices
Ryanís Prehistoric Pet
From over the wall
Appeals against conviction - conduct of trial lawyers
The absurdity of the Absconders Policy
Finding your voice in the recall process
New! Volume 5 of
is now available!
A collection of poems by prisoners of all backgrounds.
Availabe to buy from this site! Volume 1,2,3 and 4 are also still available and you can SAVE by purchasing bundles!
The Useful Services for Prisoners scheme from insidetime provides discounts, vouchers and other benefits from USP Group Members for Prisoners, their families and legal advisors. Click the image above to read more about it.
You can subscribe to insidetime Newspaper and get the paper each month delivered to your door!
Advertise your business or solicitors office to a highly defined target audience.
Inside Time has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.
All contact info for the Operations office and the Editorial Team.
Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insidetime site.
We have a number of external websites which you may be interested on our Links Page.
Everything you need to know about visiting people in prison; procedures, opening times, directions etc.
Comprehensive information about each prison regime; lock down times, facilities, healthcare etc.
*NEW* Detailed information about IRC - Immigration Removal Centres.
Various pages of information for help and support organisations and networks for those in custody as well as recently released. Also information for friends and family.
This grants and funding pdf document aims to meet the need of prisoners and ex-offenders for accurate, up to date information on the supplementary funding available to prisoners.
Information on rules & regulations used throughout the prison service.
The Glossary of Prison Related Terms explains what all the acronyms and terms stand for with prison related matters. Includes links to external sites to further explain things.
We have produced many Prison Related Fact Sheets inc. Legal Fact Sheets, Parole Fact Sheets and Other related information.
You can search our solicitor database for listings of solicitors in your area that provide the services you require.
You can search our barrister database for listings of barristers in your area that provide the services you require.
You can search our address database in many ways to retrieve contact information for all those elusive addresses you need in a hurry.
This document provides details of leading training providers who offer sound professional training.
Inside Information has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.
Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insideinformation site.
Use the Contact Us Feedback form to send us suggestions, plus our address and phone numbers.
insidejustice was launched in July 2010 to investigate alleged miscarriages of justice.
Full introduction is on the insidejustice homepage