Go Back

HMP WANDSWORTH Prison Regime Info


Heathfield Road Wandsworth SW18 3HS image of HMP WANDSWORTH prison

Phone No.

020 8588 4000

Governor / Director

Kenny Brown


Male Local



Operational Capacity


Cell Occupancy

Single and double

Listener Scheme


First Night Centre



Chair: David Deaton
Vice Chair: Matthew Shepherdson

Visitor Info Page

Navigate this page General | Unlock & Association | Sport | Library | Faith | Healthcare | Education | Employment | Offending Behaviour Courses | Resettlement | Additional Information

Online Library documents for HMP WANDSWORTH

Search our Library for New Window/Tab

Wandsworth is the largest prison in the UK, currently able to hold 1665 prisoners. Alongside Liverpool, which is of similar size, it is one of the largest prisons in Western Europe.

The prison was built in 1851, and the residential areas remain in the original buildings. Since 1989, there has been extensive refurbishment and modernisation of the wings, including in-cell sanitation, privacy screens for cells occupied by more than one prisoner and the more recent installation of in-cell electricity

The Heathfield Centre (main prison) has five wings each with four landings, used as follows:
A and B wings – general population wings holding remand and convicted prisoners
C wing – Induction Wing
D wing - convicted prisoners
E wing – First Night Centre, Care and separation unit, and detox

The Onslow Centre (vulnerable prisoners unit) has 3 wings and holds approximately 360 prisoners.

The Mick Knight Centre is a drug treatment unit for prisoners involved in RAPt.

The Kearney Unit is for prisoners involved in a programme addressing alcohol misuse.

Reception Criteria:
Normal reception arrangements: Wandsworth is a local male prison, it accepts all suitable prisoners from courts in its catchment area.



Hobbies kits
In-cell power
Own bedding
Own clothes (Enhanced only)
Playstation (Enhanced only)
Television (£1 per week)

Back to top



07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:45 & 18:00 - 20:15


07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:45 & 18:00 - 20:15


07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:45 & 18:00 - 20:15


07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:45 & 18:00 - 20:15


07:45 - 12:45 & 14:15 - 16:45


07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:00


07:45 - 12:45, 14:15 - 16:00


Association/Social and Domestic periods are conducted throughout the core day and evenings (Monday - Friday). Association is therefore done on a rota basis.

Back to top


Two gymnasiums and one sports hall

Circuit Training
Light Circuit Training
Over 40s
Over 50s
Soft Tennis
Sports Field
Weight Loss Programme

Back to top


20 minutes once a week

Back to top


Every prison has a Chaplaincy department managed by a Co-ordinating Chaplain and supported by admin staff, other Chaplains and ‘Sessional Chaplains’ (faith leaders who visit for specific services or sessions). The Chaplaincy is considered an important part of the prison structure. When a prisoner arrives at a prison they are usually seen by a Chaplain within 24 hours and are invited to register as a specific religion (if they haven’t already done so) and can change their declared religion at any time.

The Chaplaincy does far more than just pastoral care; they often are able to lend radios, musical instruments and typewriters; they may take part in Sentence Planning and are available as a ‘listening ear’ and are able, sometimes, to help with domestic problems. Most Chaplaincies run various courses and activities which may or may not have a religious theme. Every prisoner has the right to follow their religious practices and attend Chapel for services pertaining to their declared faith (even when segregated).

The Chaplaincy are able to organise faith activities for all main religions (as recognised by the Prison Service; this does not, at present include Rastafarian as a specific religion) and contact faith representatives to visit individual or groups of prisoners for the purpose of religious activities. The chaplaincy can also intercede on matters of religious dress, diet and artefacts. A full list of permitted artefacts can be found in the Glossary Section under Religious Artefacts.

You can contact the Chaplaincy by letter or by telephoning the main prison number and asking to speak to the Chaplaincy. The Chaplaincy works as part of the prison and cannot, therefore, guarantee confidentiality (they can explain this to you in detail). Prisoners can contact the Chaplaincy in person or by Application.

Chaplaincy Statement of Purpose (HMPS)
The Chaplaincy is committed to serving the needs of prisoners, staff and religious traditions by engaging all human experience. We will work collaboratively, respecting the integrity of each tradition and discipline. We believe that faith and the search for meaning directs and inspires life, and are committed to providing sacred spaces and dedicated teams to deepen and enrich human experience. We contribute to the care of prisoners to enable them to lead law-abiding and useful lives in custody and after release.

The Co-ordinating Chaplain at Wandsworth is: Tim Bryan

Wandsworth has a dedicated Chaplaincy Team led by the Co-ordinating Chaplain and supported by the following full and part time denominations: Roman Catholic, Anglican, Methodist and by a Muslim Chaplain (Imam).

Our provision is supported by a number of sessional chaplains including Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon and Jehovah's witness chaplains. The Co-ordinating Chaplain makes all appointments in conjunction with the various faith groups and Religious Consultative Services in accordance with national guidelines.

Back to top


Dentist Availability

3 times a week

Optician Availability


Physio Availability

When required

Podiatry Availability


Acupuncture Availability


Stop Smoking Availability




InReach Availability


Type of Healthcare provided

Primary Care including GP services
Substance Misuse
Primary Care Mental Health
In patient acute Mental Health
In Reach Services

Specialist Clinics

Asthma Clinic - Not at present but developing
Chlamydia screening - 6 days per week during 2nd day screening (urine testing)
CPN - 5 days per week
Dematology - monthly
Dentist - 4 days per week
Diabetic Clinic - weekly
Dietitian - monthly
Epilepsy Clinic - Not at present but developing
GUM Clinic - weekly
Hep B - when requested, offered on 2nd day screening
Inreach - 5 days per week - onsite
Optician - once a month
Physio - External service by referral
Podiatry/Chiropody - weekly
Primary Care Mental Health - 5-7 days per week onsite
Stop Smoking - weekly
Well Man - Daily

NHS Healthcare Information for Wandsworth

Prison Healthcare Manager: Jim O’Gorman
Tel: 020 8588 4000 Ext: 4186


St Georges NHS Trust, Community Services Division
South West London and St Georges Mental Health Trust

Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS)
PALS is there to help when you need advice, or wish to make a complaint. As a patient, relative or carer PALS provide confidential advice and support, helping you to sort out any concerns that you may have about any aspect of your NHS care.

The service aims to:
• advise and support patients, their families and carers
• provide information on NHS services
• listen to your concerns, suggestions or queries
• help sort out problems quickly on your behalf

PALS acts independently when handling patient and family concerns, liaising with staff, managers and where appropriate, relevant organisations to negotiate prompt solutions. If necessary they can also refer patients and families to specific local or national-based support agencies.

Contact Information

Tel: 020 8487 6322
Fax: 020 8487 6332
Email: pals@wpct.nhs.uk

Ground floor
Queen Mary's Hospital
Roehampton Lane
SW15 5PN

There is also a Dental Helpline for ALL NHS dental enquiries: 01702 226668

Back to top


Kensington and Chelsea College
Hortensia Road, London SW19 0QS
Tel: 020 7573 3600

Career Information & Advice Services (CIAS)
Prospects Services Ltd
Prospects House, 19 Elmfield Road, Bromley, Kent BR1 1LT
Tel: 020 8315 1500

Classes include; 

Art & Crafts
Basic Education
Basic Skills
Computer Studies
Creative Writing
Current Affairs
Firm Start
Key Skills
Life and Social Skills
Open University
Social & Life Skills


OFSTED inspect education establishments from schools to colleges to prisons. They inspect education facilities within prisons and have inspected HMP Wandsworth

Last Inspection Date: 09/03/2006
To read their report click here

Back to top


Available courses include;

Industrial Cleaning
Information Technology
Key Skills
Waste Management

Radio programme production skills are provided by Radio Wanno and a full range of National Open College Network courses are provided by the Physical Education dept.

BICS industrial cleaning
Bicycle maintenance centre
Bricklaying Training Centre in partnership with Laing Construction
IT and data cabling in partnership with CISCO, Bovis and Panduit
Painting and decorating
Plastering; multi-skills offering plumbing

Learning aims recorded for Skills Funding Agency OLASS
Adult Literacy
Adult Literacy (Entry 1, 2 and 3)
Adult Numeracy
Art and Design
Basic Literacy Course, Entry Level
BTEC First Diploma in Sport
Certificate for IT Users (CLAiT Plus)
Certificate for IT Users (New CLAiT)
Diploma for IT Users (New CLAiT)
ESOL Skills for Life
ESOL Skills for Life (Entry 1)
ESOL Skills for Life (Entry 3)
Food Safety in Catering (QCF)
Introductory Radio Production
Key Skills in Application of Number - level 1
Key Skills in Application of Number - level 2
Key Skills in Communication - level 1
Key Skills in Communication - level 2
Motor Vehicle Studies (QCF)
National Success in Self Employment
Non-externally certificated - Entry Level, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW A
Non-externally certificated - Entry Level, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW A
Non-externally certificated - Level 1, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW A
Non-externally certificated - Level 1, Leisure, Travel and Tourism (SSA 8), PW A
Non-externally certificated - Level 2, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW A
Non-externally certificated - Level 3, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW A
Non-externally-certificated non-FE other provision, Crafts, Creative Arts and Design SSA (09.2)
Non-externally-certificated non-FE other provision, Foundations for Learning and Life SSA (14.1)
NVQ in Food Processing and Cooking
NVQ in Multi-Skilled Hospitality Services
OCN Level 1, PW A, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Languages, Literature and Culture (SSA 12)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Retail and Commercial Enterprise (SSA 7)
OCN Level 1, PW B, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
OCN Level 2, PW A, Business, Administration and Law (SSA 15)
OCN Level 2, PW A, Languages, Literature and Culture (SSA 12)
OCN Level 2, PW A, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14)
OCN Level 2, PW A, Retail and Commercial Enterprise (SSA 7)
OCN Level 2, PW B, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
OCN Level 3, PW A, Languages, Literature and Culture (SSA 12)
OCN Level 3, PW B, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
Progression (QCF)
QCF provision - Level 1, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW A
Radio Production
Text Processing (Business Professional) (QCF)
Unitisation (approved external qualification) Entry Level, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14) - ESOL
Unitisation (approved external qualification) Level 1, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14) - ESOL

Unitisation (approved external qualification) Level 1, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14) - Numeracy


Current wage for employed

£7.00 - £22.00

Wage for retired / long term sick




Back to top


ETS Enhanced Thinking Skills
Healthy Sexual Functioning
Shame Violence Intervention
Short Duration Programme
SOTP Core Sex Offender Treatment Programmes
SOTP Extended Sex Offender Treatment Programmes
SOTP Rolling Programme


Family Days Available


Guardian Has To Stay


Own Children




Age Limits

Not disclosed

No of Visitors Permitted

Not disclosed

Back to top


Ministry of Justice Performance Rating for this prison: 3
This is on a scale from 1 (serious concerns) to 4 (Exceptional) and is worked out by the Ministry of Justice taking into account 34 criteria such as overcrowding, purposeful activities etc. A score of 3 is considered a good performance. Published quarterly.

Average weekly hours of Purposeful Activity: 18.7 (2010)
This figure is supplied by each prison to the Prison Service. Actual hours are usually dependent on activities etc. and should be taken as the maximum time either in workshops or education over a whole week.
Both of these figures are published retrospectively by the MoJ and HMPS and may have changed since the figures were published but they give a simple comparison between prisons.

Annual Budget: £32,100,000 (2011-12)*
Approx cost per prisoner place (2010): £32,015
*The annual budget allocated to the governor covers all major costs of running the prison but excludes most costs related to education and healthcare.

Parliamentary Information

Prisoners may write to either their ‘Home MP’ or the MP in whose constituency their current prison lies.
The address to write to is:
House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA



Most prisons now have PIN phones. Your relative or friend usually needs to apply to have your name and number on his/her telephone account. You will usually receive a call from the prison to check who you are and to ensure you are happy for them to call you. Prisoners cannot receive telephone calls.

There is no restriction on who prisoners can call except in the case of calls to journalists intended to be broadcast. In some cases child protection measures may mean extra checks on who they call.

Prisoners can normally make calls only during ‘association’ periods. Some prisons limit the length of time a call can last to avoid queues and people being disappointed. Prisoners’ telephone calls are very expensive; calls to landlines now cost 10p per minute and 37.5 p to mobiles (compared to 2p in a public phone box). In most prisons the phone calls can be listened to and/or recorded.

If a prisoner is newly convicted or transferred they should be offered an immediate ‘Reception’ phone call to tell you where they are. It may take a few days for numbers to be transferred or added.

When you write to a prisoner you must include your full name and address. In most prisons the letters are searched and can be read before being given to the prisoner.

You can write about anything but letters must not be obscene, name ‘victims’, or be a threat to discipline or security. Do not enclose any items with letters. Make sure you put sufficient postage to cover the costs (anything bigger than A5 counts as ‘large’). Prisoners can normally receive a ‘reasonable’ number of letters per week.

If you send greetings cards these should be of reasonable size and not padded or pouched. Do not send musical cards. If you are sending more than one card put them all inside one outer envelope, this saves postage. Remember to include your full details (you could put your details on a ‘Post-It’ note stuck to the card or include a letter which has your details).

Always put the prisoner’s full name and prison number. If the person has been moved their mail will be forwarded.

On conviction or transfer a prisoner should be given a ‘Reception’ letter to write to tell you where they are.

Prisoners are given a free letter each week to post out, they can send more, but at their own expense. Some prisons allow you to send in stamps.

You can usually send in photographs but in some prisons these must not include any image of the prisoner. Child protection measures may mean that some prisoners may not receive pictures of children, unless they are their own and were not ‘victims’. If you send pictures of children include an explanatory note identifying who the children are and their relationship to the prisoner.

It is not a good idea to send cash, this can get ‘lost’ in the prison. Prisons prefer postal orders, but you could send a cheque. Make these payable to ‘H M Prison Service’, write your name on the back and also the prisoner’s full name and prison number. Any money sent which is deemed to be ‘anonymous’ can be stopped.
Money you send is paid into the prisoner’s ‘Private Cash’ account and they get access to a certain amount (depending upon IEP) each week [currently £15.50 for Standard prisoners].

For full information about visits please refer to our ‘Visit Info’ section for this prison. Visits are very important to prisoners. At most prisons you may not give any item to the prisoner. Any items you wish to give them must usually be posted to the prison, and often after the prisoner has placed an ‘application’ for authorisation to have it sent in. The items which can be posted in are very limited. Check with the prisoner first and wait until they confirm that you can post it.

If there is a serious emergency - close family serious illness, death, or other reason you need to inform the prisoner immediately, you should telephone the main prison number and explain the problem to the operator who will transfer you to the appropriate person. If you are unhappy about their response redial and ask to speak to the Chaplaincy. Prison staff will not pass on general messages but only critical and very urgent messages. You should provide full details of the prisoner including their number.

Support and Advice
There are many very good charities and agencies who offer support and advice to people with family or friends in prison. We have a special section ‘Help/Support’ which has details and contact information for many of these. Do not hesitate or feel shy about calling any of these; they are there to offer support and advice.


Story Book Dads/Mums
Story Book Dads/Mums operates at this prison.
The imprisoned parent records a story and a message which is then edited and enhanced using digital audio software and editors remove mistakes and add sound effects and music. Finally a CD is made, a personalised cover created, and the finished disc sent to the child. The whole service is free.

Click Here for more information


Prison Video Link (PVL)
All prisons with video link facilities have at least one courtroom and two briefing rooms where the defendant can hold a conference with their solicitor before and, if required, after their court hearing.

If court hearings are not taking place it may be possible for solicitors, barristers and Probation Officers to hold interviews with a prisoner via video link to save having to visit the prison.

The facility is also available to assist the Parole Board in dealing with oral hearings.
It should be noted however that court hearings must take priority.

At other times, operational reasons may mean bookings are refused or cancelled at short notice.

To book the Video Link facility telephone: 020 8588 4000 ext 4498

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP)

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons for England and Wales (HMI Prisons) is an independent inspectorate which reports on conditions for, and treatment of, those in prisons, young offender institutions and immigration detention facilities. They provide independent scrutiny of the conditions for and treatment of prisoners and other detainees, promoting the concept of 'healthy prisons' in which staff work effectively to support prisoners and detainees to reduce reoffending or achieve other agreed outcomes.

HM Chief Inspector of Prisons (HMCIP) is appointed from outside the Prison Service, for a term of five years. The Chief Inspector reports to Ministers on the treatment of prisoners and conditions in prisons in England and Wales.

The Inspectorate’s programme of inspection is based on a mixture of chronology and risk assessment. Full inspections run on a five or three year cycle; all unannounced follow-up inspections run on a risk-assessed basis.

Full inspections
Prison establishments holding adults and young adults are inspected once every five years. Establishments holding juveniles are inspected every three years. This type of inspection lasts for at least one week. The Inspectorate collects information from many sources, including the people who work there, the people who are imprisoned or detained there, and visitors or others with an interest in the establishment. Inspection findings are reported back to the establishment’s managers. Reports are published within 16 weeks of inspection. The establishment is then expected to produce an action plan, based on the recommendations made within the report, within a short period following publication.

Full follow-up inspections
Follow-up inspections are unannounced and proportionate to risk. In full follow-up inspections inspectors assess progress made and undertake in-depth analysis of areas of serious concern identified in the previous full inspection, particularly on safety and respect.

Short follow-up inspections
Short follow-up inspections are also unannounced and conducted where the previous full inspection and their intelligence systems suggest that there are comparatively fewer concerns.

Escort inspections
Three escort inspections are conducted every year.

Pre-inspection visit
One month prior to each full announced inspection, an inspector will visit the establishment to plan the inspection and request a range of preliminary information. In addition, researchers will attend to conduct a confidential survey of a representative proportion of the prisoner population. Results from the prisoner survey are provided for inspectors prior to the inspection and constitute an important source of evidence.

The inspection
All inspections are conducted against the Inspectorate's published inspection criteria, 'Expectations'. Expectations' are based on international human rights standards, as well as Prison Service Orders and Standards, and over all issues considered essential to the safe, respectful and purposeful treatment of prisoners in custody and their effective resettlement.
'Expectations' is the document which sets out the detailed criteria HMI Prisons uses to appraise and inspect prisons. These criteria are used to examine every area of prison life, from reception to resettlement, including;

• safer custody
• health services
• good order
• work
• diversity
• resettlement

The concept of a healthy prison is one that was first set out by the World Health Organisation, but it has been developed by this Inspectorate, and is now widely accepted as a definition of what ought to be provided in any custodial environment. It rests upon four key tests:

• safety: prisoners, even the most vulnerable, are held safely
• respect: prisoners are treated with respect for their human dignity
• purposeful activity: prisoners are able, and expected, to engage in activity that is likely to benefit them
• resettlement: prisoners are prepared for release into the community, and helped to reduce the likelihood of reoffending

Post-inspection action
Inspection reports are published within 16 weeks of the inspection. Prior to publication, the Prison Service (or whoever is responsible for the establishment) is invited to correct any factual inaccuracies within the report. The establishment is then expected to produce an action plan, based on the recommendations made in the report, within two months of publication. A progress report on the action plain is produced after a further 12 months.


Last Inspection by HMCIP: 28 February – 4 March 2011 - unannounced full follow-up inspection
Report Dated: June 2011
Published: August 10th 2011

They said:
“Our last inspection of HMP Wandsworth in June 2009 was marred by an attempt to subvert the process by moving ‘difficult’ prisoners between Wandsworth and Pentonville so they were not present in either prison during the inspection. This action by managers at the prisons overshadowed the inspection findings at Wandsworth, which otherwise would have reported on good progress in a prison that had been of concern for some time.

“ There was no attempt to subvert this follow-up inspection. However, the prison’s progress had halted and overall outcomes for prisoners were significantly worse than at the time of the last inspection. In particular, the safety of prisoners held in Wandsworth is now a matter of serious concern.

“ HMP Wandsworth is a large, Victorian, category B prison serving the courts of South London. There is no doubt it holds a challenging population with multiple problems, many of whom are held for only short periods. We were told that morale in the prison had suffered after the progress made by the time of the last inspection was undermined by the prisoner swap. Nevertheless, Wandsworth compared badly with similar prisons facing similar challenges and we were concerned by what appeared to be unwillingness among some prison managers and staff to acknowledge and take responsibility for the problems the prison faced.

“ The level of self-harm and the number of self-inflicted deaths were high. There had been about 700 ACCT documents opened in 2010, 120 in the first two months of 2011 and 60 open at the time of the inspection. Typically, there were about 32 incidents of self-harm each month and about 60 open ACCT documents at any given time. There had been 11 deaths in custody between January 2010 and the time of this inspection; four of these had apparently been self inflicted. Key areas of risk were the inconsistent quality of ACCT procedures and the practice of moving prisoners who were stabilising from drugs or detoxing from alcohol out of the first night centre, where they could be closely monitored, before stabilisation was complete. We were also concerned that poor staff-prisoner relationships, the lack of a predictable regime, deficiency of association, and insufficient activity contributed to feelings of isolation and alienation that might have led to self-harming behaviour.

“ Only 58% of prisoners (against the 70% comparator and 73% at the time of the last inspection) said they had a member of staff in the prison they could turn to if they had a problem. We observed frequently indifferent and sometimes abusive staff interactions with prisoners. Prisoners struggled to get assistance with low level domestic issues or answers to simple queries. The formal application and complaints systems were overwhelmed and ineffective. Inspectors were inundated by prisoners asking for reasonable help with small things because the prison staff did not assist. The induction process was poor and many prisoners lacked basic knowledge about the routines and rules of the prison.

“ Prisoners with any sort of specific individual need were particularly disadvantaged. We found prisoners with mobility difficulties located on residential landings which did not allow them access to showers. One prisoner with a disability had been remanded at the prison for more than three months and told us he had not had a shower in that time. There was no strategy to meet the needs of foreign national prisoners. Despite the presence of UKBA staff in the prison, liaison arrangements did not appear to be effective. Many foreign national prisoners were held beyond the end of their sentence – one for three years. We were told by the independent advice service that inaccurate information had led to some detainees being incorrectly held.

“ Most cells were shared and had inadequately screened toilets. First night cells were not cleaned of graffiti; some of what we saw was racist. At best, prisoners were locked in their cells for 16.5 hours a day (but even that was not every day of the week); at worst, prisoners were out of their cells for just two hours a day. Association was often cancelled and when it did occur there was little for prisoners to do and we observed little interaction with officers.

“ Exercise in the fresh air was limited to 30 minutes a day but this was cancelled in bad weather and recreational use of the PE facilities was poor. The core day was not adhered to. There were good training opportunities in the workshops but it was disappointing to see the excellent Timpsons workshop operating at well below capacity.

“ Victims of bullying behaviour were not adequately protected. Processes to identify and respond to both individual incidents and patterns of violent behaviour and to support victims were ineffective. The level of use of force remained high and our examination of records of incidents showed that de-escalation was not always used. Reviews and records of the use of force were not sufficiently rigorous and neither we nor the prison could be assured that all use of force was proportionate and necessary.

“ The segregation unit lacked direction. The regime was poor and there appeared to be little attempt to tackle and resolve any of the underlying reasons for prisoners’ behaviour. One prisoner with obvious communication difficulties, lying in on his bed with a blanket over his head and an uneaten meal beside him, told me he would refuse to go back to normal location because he was being bullied. Segregation staff did not appear to be aware of his concerns or have attempted to resolve them and it seemed all too likely that confrontation would occur when it was time for him to return.

“ The prison did not respond adequately to the needs of the diverse population it held. In addition to the concerns about prisoners with disabilities and foreign national prisoners referred to above, black and minority ethnic prisoners were disadvantaged in significant areas of the prison and this needed to be addressed as a matter of urgency. Performance in other diversity strands was also weak and diversity was not visibly promoted in the prison. Health care offered a generally better picture. The Jones Unit provided a high level of inpatient care in a good environment for prisoners with a physical illness. Mental health services were good and when transfers to secure mental health units were required they were not unduly delayed.

“ In our survey, 40% of prisoners, against a comparator of 23%, said that the food was good or very good. We received few complaints about the food.

“ Resettlement was the best area of the provision and some good resettlement services were provided. Work on accommodation, education, training and employment and substance misuse was encouraging but all area of resettlement would be strengthened by a strategy based on a needs analysis and opportunities for prisoners to engage with resettlement services earlier in their sentences.

“ We were told that some resettlement services would be discontinued. It was not clear whether this was for budgetary or other reasons. This compounded disruptions or cancellations to many aspects of the prison regime, as described in this report, which were caused by staff shortages and redeployments.

“ The treatment and conditions of simply too many prisoners at Wandsworth was demeaning, unsafe and fell below what could be classed as decent. I did not detect sufficient willingness in the prison to acknowledge and address these concerns. I hope the Prison Service management will now act decisively to reverse the prison’s decline.”

Nick Hardwick June2011
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons


Click Here to download the full report

Previous Report
by HMCIP: 1–5 June 2009 - announced inspection

They said

“This could have been an inspection report that focused on continuing progress and improvement in a prison that has, in the past, been the source of considerable concern to the Inspectorate and the Prison Service. Under the then Governor, considerable steps had been taken to change a previously resistant staff culture, increase the quality and quantity of activities, and improve prisoners’ resettlement chances. All this was evident in the course of the inspection and is recorded in the body of this report.

“However, the prison’s reputation has been seriously tarnished by the irresponsible, pointless and potentially dangerous actions instigated at managerial level, in conjunction with managers at Pentonville, whose report is also published today. Together, they planned to swap a small number of prisoners for the duration of their respective inspections – in Wandsworth’s case to remove five prisoners perceived to be potentially ‘difficult’. The consequences at Wandsworth were particularly serious. Three prisoners from the segregation unit and two from the vulnerable prisoner wing were summarily told on the weekend before the inspection that they were to move to Pentonville. One was new to prison and already identified as in need of protection. Two others would miss medical appointments for serious conditions. Both were so distressed that they self-harmed. One, with a previous history of self-harm, tied a ligature round his neck, cut himself and was forcibly removed from his cell. He was taken to reception, bloody, handcuffed and dressed only in underwear. He attempted self-harm a further three times immediately after his move to Pentonville. The other took an overdose of prescription drugs and needed to go to hospital. On his return, he was nevertheless later taken by taxi to Pentonville. Those men, and two of the other transferees, were returned to Wandsworth immediately after the inspection was over.

“These actions were a dereliction of the prison’s duty of care to prisoners. Every prison in the country knows that prisoners are particularly vulnerable to suicide in the days immediately after they move to a new prison. Wandsworth managers had particular reason to know this, as prisoner transfers without notice was something that was highlighted by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman in relation to a previous death in custody in the prison. The Ombudsman is now separately investigating the self-inflicted death of another prisoner moved to Pentonville, following a court appearance, in the week before the inspection, and held there during the inspection before being returned to Wandsworth.

“In terms of the effect on the inspection, the prisoner transfers were completely pointless. It is impossible that the views of five prisoners (one of whom had previously contacted inspectors and four of whom have now been separately interviewed) would have influenced the inspection. Indeed, the transfers have had the opposite effect, casting doubt on the governance of the prison and the commitment, at senior level, to the safe and respectful treatment of those in its care.

“The considerable efforts over some time to improve Wandsworth will inevitably be overshadowed by these events, sadly for the many staff and managers who have worked hard to achieve this. The body of this report records those positive changes. First night and induction procedures had improved, as had prisoners’ relationships with staff. There was some positive work on race, though work with foreign national and disabled prisoners was underdeveloped. For a local prison, there was a commendable amount of activity, with some good quality vocational training, and prisoners were out of their cells for a reasonable amount of time. Resettlement work was also developing well, with some good local and community links, though the needs of short-term and remanded prisoners (a considerable percentage) were not systematically met.

“However, this inspection will instead be remembered for the unacceptable attempts, at managerial level, to subvert the inspection process at the expense of prisoners’ well-being. This is deplorable, not only because of the effects on individuals, but because of the underlying mind-set: that prisoners are merely pieces to be moved around the board to meet performance targets or burnish the reputation of the prison. Those involved in the decision and its implementation not only lost sight of their primary duty to those in their care, but also sent a message to more junior staff that prisoners’ wellbeing is negotiable – and this in a prison which had been struggling to change a negative staff culture, and where the levels of use of force by staff are still of concern. Both the actual consequences and the approach that gave rise to them are necessarily reflected in our assessments. This should never happen again; and it is welcome, though it should not have been necessary, that the Director General of the National Offender Management Service has instructed Governors to that effect.”

Anne Owers September 2009
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons

Click here to read the full report


Independent Monitoring Board

By law every prison and immigration removal centre must have an Independent Monitoring Board. IMBs in prisons derive their responsibilities from the Prison Act 1952 (Section 6). Prison Rules dealing with IMDs are numbers; 74 to 80

IMBs were known as ‘Boards of Visitors’ and are still referred to in the legislation under their old titles, although this is likely to change in the near future.

The Independent Monitoring Board for each establishment is made up of independent and unpaid volunteers from the local area. They monitor the day-to-day life in the establishment and ensure that proper standards of care and decency are maintained. Members have unrestricted access to all areas of the prison at all times and can talk to any prisoner they wish, out of sight and hearing of a members of staff. They visit all areas such as; kitchens, workshops, accommodation blocks, recreation areas, healthcare centre and chaplaincy.

If a prisoner or detainee has an issue that they have been unable to resolve through the usual internal channels, they can place a confidential request to see a member of the IMB. Problems might include concerns over lost property, visits from family or friends, special religious or cultural requirements, or even serious allegations such as bullying. In addition, if something serious happens at the prison, for example a riot or a death in custody, IMB members may be called in to attend and observe the way in which it is handled.

IMB members sample food, can attend adjudications and should visit people held in the segregation unit. They must also be kept informed on such issues as the use of restraints.

The IMB meets regularly, usually once per month, and has an elected Chair and Vice Chair. Members work together as a team to raise any matters of concern and to keep an independent eye on the prison.


CLICK HERE - to read the latest IMB reports for any prison.
Click on the year and then select the prison.

Information in this section has been kindly provided by the individual prison and the Ministry of Justice. This is supplemented with information from various government websites, Inspectorates and IMB reports and specialist departments within the Prison Service, government, and regional assemblies/parliaments.
Some of the data is published retrospectively: IMBs/Visiting Committees publish their reports up to 6 months after the end of the reporting period and at different times throughout the year, HMCIP publish their reports up to 6 months after the inspection. Population and performance figures are the latest published but can be considerably out of date.
Please Note: Information is constantly changing: The information on our website is regularly checked but if you have additional information, or if you believe that any of our information is incorrect or any links appear to fail please click on ‘Contact’, below.
Before acting upon any information you are advised to contact the prison directly to ensure there have been no recent changes.

Last Update: March 2012


Back to Top


Inside Time Latest Issue

Issue : December 2014

Headlines | Mailbag | Poems
Book List | PSI Updates


Back Issues

Back Issues

View backissues and extras

Browse and Search Tools

View headlines by category
Search headlines | All headlines
Search mailbag | All mailbag
Search poems | All poems

December 2014 Headlines
> Treat Prisoners as Human Beings, Not Criminals
> What are prisons for
> A search for any trace of the governmentís Rehabilitation Revolution
> Tell us why you did it?... You must be joking I didnít do it
> Care Act - what does it mean for prisoners
> Doctor Frankenstein and his monster
> Human Rights: truth and lies
> Scapegoating the undeserving poor
> Interview
> The first Miscarriage of Justice
> Month by Month - December 2014
> The 2014 Longford Trust Awards
> Is it all in the mind
> Time
> Learning in prison
> Take your first Steps to Success in 2015
> Spotlight Police and Crime Commissioners
> From over the wall
> Over-tariff IPPs: an appeal for your stories
> Paperwork is the key
> Adjudication - donít let those days count against you
> Insider Dealing
> Christmas Stories
> Christmas Messages
> Christmas Messages

About Us

About insidetime
Editorial Team

InsidePoetry Book

insidepoetry book New! Volume 5 of
insidepoetry book
is now available!

A collection of poems by prisoners of all backgrounds.

Availabe to buy from this site! Volume 1,2,3 and 4 are also still available and you can SAVE by purchasing bundles!

USP Service

USP from Inside Time

The Useful Services for Prisoners scheme from insidetime provides discounts, vouchers and other benefits from USP Group Members for Prisoners, their families and legal advisors. Click the image above to read more about it.


You can subscribe to insidetime Newspaper and get the paper each month delivered to your door!


Advertise your business or solicitors office to a highly defined target audience.

Other Publications

Inside Time has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.


Contact Us

All contact info for the Operations office and the Editorial Team.

Site Map

Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insidetime site.

External Links

We have a number of external websites which you may be interested on our Links Page.

Social Networking


Inside Information


Everything you need to know about visiting people in prison; procedures, opening times, directions etc.

Comprehensive information about each prison regime; lock down times, facilities, healthcare etc.

*NEW* Detailed information about IRC - Immigration Removal Centres.

insideinformation Book

insideinformation book
The insideinformation book

A comprehensive guide to prisons and prison related services, designed and compiled by former prisoners.


Help and Support

Various pages of information for help and support organisations and networks for those in custody as well as recently released. Also information for friends and family.

Grants and Funding

This grants and funding pdf document aims to meet the need of prisoners and ex-offenders for accurate, up to date information on the supplementary funding available to prisoners.

Rules and Regulations

Information on rules & regulations used throughout the prison service.

Glossary of Terms

The Glossary of Prison Related Terms explains what all the acronyms and terms stand for with prison related matters. Includes links to external sites to further explain things.

Fact Sheets

We have produced many Prison Related Fact Sheets inc. Legal Fact Sheets, Parole Fact Sheets and Other related information.


Find a Solicitor

You can search our solicitor database for listings of solicitors in your area that provide the services you require.

Find a Barrister

You can search our barrister database for listings of barristers in your area that provide the services you require.

Address Finder

You can search our address database in many ways to retrieve contact information for all those elusive addresses you need in a hurry.

Prison Law pdf

This document provides details of leading training providers who offer sound professional training.

Other Publications

Inside Information has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.

Site Map

Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insideinformation site.

Contact Us

Use the Contact Us Feedback form to send us suggestions, plus our address and phone numbers.



Inside Justice

insidejustice was launched in July 2010 to investigate alleged miscarriages of justice.

Full introduction is on the insidejustice homepage

insidejustice Cases

insidejustice Articles & Reviews

insidejustice Advisory Panel Members

insidejustice Sponsors page

insidejusticecontact details