Go Back

HMYOI STOKE HEATH Prison Regime Info


Warrant Road Market Drayton Shropshire TF9 2JL image of HMYOI STOKE HEATH prison

Phone No.

01630 636 000

Governor / Director

John Huntington


Male YOI


West Midlands

Operational Capacity


Cell Occupancy

Single and Double

Listener Scheme


First Night Centre



Chair: Graham Oliver
Vice Chair: Valerie Meachin

Visitor Info Page

Navigate this page General | Unlock & Association | Sport | Library | Faith | Healthcare | Education | Employment | Offending Behaviour Courses | Resettlement | Additional Information

Online Library documents for HMYOI STOKE HEATH

Search our Library for New Window/Tab

Stoke Heath is a young offender institution holding young adult males aged 18–21 and young people under 18 (male).


Stoke Heath was built in 1964 as a category C adult prison. It was converted to a borstal two years later.
Stoke Heath doubled in size in 1997 with two new wings. The establishment has managed overcrowding since 2002, with an extra 116 young offenders above normal capacity.

A new healthcare centre was opened in 2004, and there is a new resettlement unit.

A new wing holding 60 young adults opened in January 2008.

Since January 2008, a wing or part of a wing has been out of operation on a rotation basis due to fire safety work throughout the establishment.



  • A wing - Induction unit/sentenced juveniles
  • B wing - Young adults/healthy living unit
  • C wing - Sentenced juveniles/vulnerable juvenile unit
  • D wing - Juvenile remands/juvenile personal development unit
  • E wing - Young adults/induction unit
  • F wing - Young adults
  • G wing - Young adults
  • I wing - Young adults


  • Hobbies kits during lock-up
  • In-cell power
  • Own bedding (Enhanced)
  • Own clothes (Enhanced only)
  • Playstation (Enhanced only)
  • Television (£1 per week)

Back to top



07:45 - 12:30, 13:35 - 17:30 & 18:05 - 20:00


07:45 - 12:30, 13:35 - 17:30 & 18:05 - 20:00


07:45 - 12:30, 13:35 - 17:30 & 18:05 - 20:00


07:45 - 12:30, 13:35 - 17:30 & 18:05 - 20:00


07:45 - 12:30, 13:35 - 17:30 & (18:05 - 20:00 Young people only)


08:30 - 12:30 & 13:35 - 17:30


08:30 - 12:30 & 13:35 - 17:30



18:05 - 19:00 & 19:05 - 20:00


18:05 - 19:00 & 19:05 - 20:00


18:05 - 19:00 & 19:05 - 20:00


18:05 - 19:00 & 19:05 - 20:00


18:05 - 19:00 & 19:05 - 20:00


10:30 - 11:30 (Enhanced only), 13:35 - 15:00 & 15:05 - 16:30


10:30 - 11:30 (Enhanced only), 13:35 - 15:00 & 15:05 - 16:30

Back to top


There is a large sports hall, marked out for football, badminton, basketball and volleyball, fully equipped weights, cardiovascular, remedial room, good showering and changing facilities: full size Astroturf football pitch, grass sports field; Aerobics; fitness room.

DoE, BAWLA, AQA and First aid qualifications are available.


Sports available include;

Circuit Training
Indoor Bowls
Light Circuit Training
Soft Tennis
Sports Field
Weight Loss Programme
Weight Training

Back to top


45 minutes per day on a rota

Back to top


Every prison has a Chaplaincy department managed by a Co-ordinating Chaplain and supported by admin staff, other Chaplains and ‘Sessional Chaplains’ (faith leaders who visit for specific services or sessions). The Chaplaincy is considered an important part of the prison structure. When a prisoner arrives at a prison they are usually seen by a Chaplain within 24 hours and are invited to register as a specific religion (if they haven’t already done so) and can change their declared religion at any time.

The Chaplaincy does far more than just pastoral care; they often are able to lend radios, musical instruments and typewriters; they may take part in Sentence Planning and are available as a ‘listening ear’ and are able, sometimes, to help with domestic problems. Most Chaplaincies run various courses and activities which may or may not have a religious theme. Every prisoner has the right to follow their religious practices and attend Chapel for services pertaining to their declared faith (even when segregated).

The Chaplaincy are able to organise faith activities for all main religions (as recognised by the Prison Service; this does not, at present include Rastafarian as a specific religion) and contact faith representatives to visit individual or groups of prisoners for the purpose of religious activities. The chaplaincy can also intercede on matters of religious dress, diet and artefacts. A full list of permitted artefacts can be found in the Glossary Section under Religious Artefacts.

You can contact the Chaplaincy by letter or by telephoning the main prison number and asking to speak to the Chaplaincy. The Chaplaincy works as part of the prison and cannot, therefore, guarantee confidentiality (they can explain this to you in detail). Prisoners can contact the Chaplaincy in person or by Application.

Chaplaincy Statement of Purpose (HMPS)
The Chaplaincy is committed to serving the needs of prisoners, staff and religious traditions by engaging all human experience. We will work collaboratively, respecting the integrity of each tradition and discipline. We believe that faith and the search for meaning directs and inspires life, and are committed to providing sacred spaces and dedicated teams to deepen and enrich human experience. We contribute to the care of prisoners to enable them to lead law-abiding and useful lives in custody and after release.

The Co-ordinating Chaplain at Stoke Heath is: Jane Newsome


Full-time Anglican and Methodist Chaplains. Full-time Imam. Part-time Catholic Chaplain

Facilities for;
Buddhist, Hindu, Jehovah Witness, Mormon, Pagan, Sikh

There is a light and well presented Chapel able to seat 150. Two multi-denomination church services are held on Sundays. Roman Catholic service is held on Saturday morning. Muslim service is held on Friday afternoons. Sikh services are held on Sundays.

The Chaplaincy team visit all new trainees/ young offenders on induction.


Occasional outside visiting ministry attend worship including Gospel Choirs and Drama groups.

Back to top


Dentist Availability


Optician Availability

As required

Physio Availability

As required

Podiatry Availability

As required

Stop Smoking Availability




InReach Availability



NHS Healthcare Information for Stoke Heath

Prison Healthcare Manager: Leil Phillips
Tel: 01630 636000

PCT: Shropshire County Primary Care Trust
West Midlands Strategic Health Authority

Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS)
PALS is there to help when you need advice, or wish to make a complaint. As a patient, relative or carer PALS provide confidential advice and support, helping you to sort out any concerns that you may have about any aspect of your NHS care.

The service aims to:
• advise and support patients, their families and carers
• provide information on NHS services
• listen to your concerns, suggestions or queries
• help sort out problems quickly on your behalf

PALS acts independently when handling patient and family concerns, liaising with staff, managers and where appropriate, relevant organisations to negotiate prompt solutions. If necessary they can also refer patients and families to specific local or national-based support agencies.

Contact Information

Tel: 0800 032 1107
Fax: 01743 497078

PALS Coordinator
Oak Lodge
William Farr Site
Mytton Oak Road

There is also a Dental Helpline for ALL NHS dental enquiries: 01702 226668


Back to top


The Manchester College
The Manchester College, Offender Learning Directorate, Fielden Compus, Burlow Manor Road M1 3HB
Tel: 0800 068 8585

Career Information & Advice Services (CIAS)
JHP Group Ltd
Sutherland House, Matlock Road, Foleshill, Coventry, West Midlands CV1 4JQ
Tel: 024 7666 7891

Courses offered include;

Basic Education
Catering entry level, level 1, 2 & 3
Computer building course
Computer Studies
Creative Writing
End of sentence employability courses
Information Technology entry level, Level 1, 2 & 3
Key Skills
LearnDirect courses.
Life and Social Skills
Literacy/Numeracy Entry Level, Level 1 and 2
Music and drama
Open University
Skills for life entry level, Level 1 & 2
Sports studies from entry Level, Level 1, 2 & 3


OFSTED inspect education establishments from schools to colleges to prisons. They inspect education facilities within prisons and have inspected Stoke Heath.


To read their latest report click here

Back to top


Prison Workshops


Employment includes;

  • Cleaning Duties
  • Domestic Duties
  • Gardens
  • Gym
  • Kitchen
  • Library
  • Painting Parties
  • Recycling
  • Stores

There are work opportunities in the engineering workshops including;

  • Assembly
  • Grinding
  • Laundry.
  • Machine Production
  • Press
  • Tailoring
  • Welding production

Vocational training provided by City College Manchester include;

  • Basic Electrics
  • Industrial Cleaning
  • Painting and Decorating
  • Plumbing
  • Welding training
  • Woodwork

NVQ Awards courses are provided by City College Manchester; 

  • Catering and Hospitality Level 1 &2
  • Customer Services Level 1
  • Distributive Operations Level 1
  • Food Hygiene Level 1
  • Horticulture Entry Level
  • Production and Manufacturing Operations Level 1 &2

There are two further providers of education and training:

Stoke on Trent College who deliver NVQs in the Laundry and Tailors.

North Shropshire and Walford College who provide Literacy and Numeracy for short stay trainees; and an employability package.


Learning aims recorded for Skills Funding Agency OLASS
Adult Literacy
Adult Numeracy
Art and Design
Basic Construction Skills
Car Valeting Certificate
Certificate for IT Users (CLAiT Plus)
Certificate for IT Users (New CLAiT)
Cleaning Operators' Proficiency Certificate
Cleaning Science
Construction Skills Certification Scheme
Customer Service (QCF)
Food Safety in Catering (QCF)
Fundamentals of Food Hygiene
Introductory Welding Skills
Introductory Welding Skills (QCF)
Motor Vehicle Studies (QCF)
NQF - Entry Level, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW B
NQF - Level 1, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW C
NQF - Level 1, Construction, Planning and the Built Environment (SSA 5), PW C
NQF - Level 1, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW A
NQF - Level 1, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW B
NQF - Level 2, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW C
NQF - Level 2, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW B
NVQ in Customer Service
NVQ in Hospitality
NVQ in Performing Manufacturing Operations
NVQ in Warehousing and Storage
NVQ in Waste Management Operations
OCN Entry Level, PW A, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Health, Public Services and Care (SSA 1)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Languages, Literature and Culture (SSA 12)
OCN Level 1, PW A, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14)
OCN Level 1, PW B, Agriculture, Horticulture and Animal Care (SSA 3)
OCN Level 1, PW C, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9)
OCN Level 2, PW A, Retail and Commercial Enterprise (SSA 7)
OCN Level 2, PW C, Retail and Commercial Enterprise (SSA 7)
Practical skills/crafts, Health, Public Services and Care (SSA 1)
Progression (QCF)
QCF provision - Entry Level, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW A
QCF provision - Entry Level, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14), PW A
QCF provision - Level 1, Agriculture, Horticulture and Animal Care (SSA 3), PW B
QCF provision - Level 1, Arts, Media and Publishing (SSA 9), PW B
QCF provision - Level 1, Health, Public Services and Care (SSA 1), PW A
QCF provision - Level 1, Health, Public Services and Care (SSA 1), PW B
QCF provision - Level 1, Information and Communication Technology (SSA 6), PW A
QCF provision - Level 1, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14), PW A
QCF provision - Level 2, Preparation for Life and Work (SSA 14), PW A
Welding Skills

Welding Skills (QCF)


Current wage for employed

£4.00 - £14.00


£4.50 / £6.00 / £8.00 (IEP based)

Back to top


Enhanced Thinking Skills (ETS)



Family Days Available


Guardian Has To Stay


Own Children




Age Limits

No limit

No of Visitors Permitted

2 adults and 2 children

Back to top


Ministry of Justice Performance Rating for this prison: 3
This is on a scale from 1 (serious concerns) to 4 (Exceptional) and is worked out by the Ministry of Justice taking into account 34 criteria such as overcrowding, purposeful activities etc. A score of 3 is considered a good performance. Published quarterly.

Average weekly hours of Purposeful Activity: 25.0 (2010)
This figure is supplied by each prison to the Prison Service. Actual hours are usually dependent on activities etc. and should be taken as the maximum time either in workshops or education over a whole week.
Both of these figures are published retrospectively by the MoJ and HMPS and may have changed since the figures were published but they give a simple comparison between prisons.

Annual Budget: £17,300,000 (2011-12)*
Approx cost per prisoner place (2010): £42,883
*The annual budget allocated to the governor covers all major costs of running the prison but excludes most costs related to education and healthcare.

Parliamentary Information
CONSTITUENCY: Shropshire North
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT: Owen Paterson (Conservative) - Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Member of the Privy Council

Prisoners may write to either their ‘Home MP’ or the MP in whose constituency their current prison lies.
The address to write to is:
House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA



Most prisons now have PIN phones. Your relative or friend usually needs to apply to have your name and number on his/her telephone account. You will usually receive a call from the prison to check who you are and to ensure you are happy for them to call you. Prisoners cannot receive telephone calls.

There is no restriction on who prisoners can call except in the case of calls to journalists intended to be broadcast. In some cases child protection measures may mean extra checks on who they call.

Prisoners can normally make calls only during ‘association’ periods. Some prisons limit the length of time a call can last to avoid queues and people being disappointed. Prisoners’ telephone calls are very expensive; calls to landlines now cost 10p per minute and 37.5 p to mobiles (compared to 2p in a public phone box). In most prisons the phone calls can be listened to and/or recorded.

If a prisoner is newly convicted or transferred they should be offered an immediate ‘Reception’ phone call to tell you where they are. It may take a few days for numbers to be transferred or added.

When you write to a prisoner you must include your full name and address. In most prisons the letters are searched and can be read before being given to the prisoner.

You can write about anything but letters must not be obscene, name ‘victims’, or be a threat to discipline or security. Do not enclose any items with letters. Make sure you put sufficient postage to cover the costs (anything bigger than A5 counts as ‘large’). Prisoners can normally receive a ‘reasonable’ number of letters per week.

If you send greetings cards these should be of reasonable size and not padded or pouched. Do not send musical cards. If you are sending more than one card put them all inside one outer envelope, this saves postage. Remember to include your full details (you could put your details on a ‘Post-It’ note stuck to the card or include a letter which has your details).

Always put the prisoner’s full name and prison number. If the person has been moved their mail will be forwarded.

On conviction or transfer a prisoner should be given a ‘Reception’ letter to write to tell you where they are.

Prisoners are given a free letter each week to post out, they can send more, but at their own expense. Some prisons allow you to send in stamps.

You can usually send in photographs but in some prisons these must not include any image of the prisoner. Child protection measures may mean that some prisoners may not receive pictures of children, unless they are their own and were not ‘victims’. If you send pictures of children include an explanatory note identifying who the children are and their relationship to the prisoner.

It is not a good idea to send cash, this can get ‘lost’ in the prison. Prisons prefer postal orders, but you could send a cheque. Make these payable to ‘H M Prison Service’, write your name on the back and also the prisoner’s full name and prison number. Any money sent which is deemed to be ‘anonymous’ can be stopped.
Money you send is paid into the prisoner’s ‘Private Cash’ account and they get access to a certain amount (depending upon IEP) each week [currently £15.50 for Standard prisoners].

For full information about visits please refer to our ‘Visit Info’ section for this prison. Visits are very important to prisoners. At most prisons you may not give any item to the prisoner. Any items you wish to give them must usually be posted to the prison, and often after the prisoner has placed an ‘application’ for authorisation to have it sent in. The items which can be posted in are very limited. Check with the prisoner first and wait until they confirm that you can post it.

If there is a serious emergency - close family serious illness, death, or other reason you need to inform the prisoner immediately, you should telephone the main prison number and explain the problem to the operator who will transfer you to the appropriate person. If you are unhappy about their response redial and ask to speak to the Chaplaincy. Prison staff will not pass on general messages but only critical and very urgent messages. You should provide full details of the prisoner including their number.

Support and Advice
There are many very good charities and agencies who offer support and advice to people with family or friends in prison. We have a special section ‘Help/Support’ which has details and contact information for many of these. Do not hesitate or feel shy about calling any of these; they are there to offer support and advice.

This service operates at this prison. Email a Prisoner enables you to send messages to prisoners, in the UK and Irish prisons that operate the service, from any computer, without any of the hassles of writing and posting a letter, and it costs less than a second class stamp!

Your message is delivered to the prison within seconds so that it can be delivered to the prisoner by the prison staff in the next delivery.

It is free to sign up to Email a Prisoner and only takes a few seconds - all you need is an email address (EMaP can help you if you don't have an email address).

Once a member you will be able to send a message to any prisoner in the UK or Ireland, provided you know their prisoner number, from just 25 pence per message.

Click Here for link to Email a Prisoner website


Prison Video Link (PVL)
All prisons with video link facilities have at least one courtroom and two briefing rooms where the defendant can hold a conference with their solicitor before and, if required, after their court hearing.

If court hearings are not taking place it may be possible for solicitors, barristers and Probation Officers to hold interviews with a prisoner via video link to save having to visit the prison.

The facility is also available to assist the Parole Board in dealing with oral hearings.
It should be noted however that court hearings must take priority.

At other times, operational reasons may mean bookings are refused or cancelled at short notice.

To book the Video Link facility telephone: 01630 636000 ext 6254

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP)

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons for England and Wales (HMI Prisons) is an independent inspectorate which reports on conditions for, and treatment of, those in prisons, young offender institutions and immigration detention facilities. They provide independent scrutiny of the conditions for and treatment of prisoners and other detainees, promoting the concept of 'healthy prisons' in which staff work effectively to support prisoners and detainees to reduce reoffending or achieve other agreed outcomes.

HM Chief Inspector of Prisons (HMCIP) is appointed from outside the Prison Service, for a term of five years. The Chief Inspector reports to Ministers on the treatment of prisoners and conditions in prisons in England and Wales.

The Inspectorate’s programme of inspection is based on a mixture of chronology and risk assessment. Full inspections run on a five or three year cycle; all unannounced follow-up inspections run on a risk-assessed basis.

Full inspections
Prison establishments holding adults and young adults are inspected once every five years. Establishments holding juveniles are inspected every three years. This type of inspection lasts for at least one week. The Inspectorate collects information from many sources, including the people who work there, the people who are imprisoned or detained there, and visitors or others with an interest in the establishment. Inspection findings are reported back to the establishment’s managers. Reports are published within 16 weeks of inspection. The establishment is then expected to produce an action plan, based on the recommendations made within the report, within a short period following publication.

Full follow-up inspections
Follow-up inspections are unannounced and proportionate to risk. In full follow-up inspections inspectors assess progress made and undertake in-depth analysis of areas of serious concern identified in the previous full inspection, particularly on safety and respect.

Short follow-up inspections
Short follow-up inspections are also unannounced and conducted where the previous full inspection and their intelligence systems suggest that there are comparatively fewer concerns.

Escort inspections
Three escort inspections are conducted every year.

Pre-inspection visit
One month prior to each full announced inspection, an inspector will visit the establishment to plan the inspection and request a range of preliminary information. In addition, researchers will attend to conduct a confidential survey of a representative proportion of the prisoner population. Results from the prisoner survey are provided for inspectors prior to the inspection and constitute an important source of evidence.

The inspection
All inspections are conducted against the Inspectorate's published inspection criteria, 'Expectations'. Expectations' are based on international human rights standards, as well as Prison Service Orders and Standards, and over all issues considered essential to the safe, respectful and purposeful treatment of prisoners in custody and their effective resettlement.
'Expectations' is the document which sets out the detailed criteria HMI Prisons uses to appraise and inspect prisons. These criteria are used to examine every area of prison life, from reception to resettlement, including;

• safer custody
• health services
• good order
• work
• diversity
• resettlement

The concept of a healthy prison is one that was first set out by the World Health Organisation, but it has been developed by this Inspectorate, and is now widely accepted as a definition of what ought to be provided in any custodial environment. It rests upon four key tests:

• safety: prisoners, even the most vulnerable, are held safely
• respect: prisoners are treated with respect for their human dignity
• purposeful activity: prisoners are able, and expected, to engage in activity that is likely to benefit them
• resettlement: prisoners are prepared for release into the community, and helped to reduce the likelihood of reoffending

Post-inspection action
Inspection reports are published within 16 weeks of the inspection. Prior to publication, the Prison Service (or whoever is responsible for the establishment) is invited to correct any factual inaccuracies within the report. The establishment is then expected to produce an action plan, based on the recommendations made in the report, within two months of publication. A progress report on the action plain is produced after a further 12 months.


Last Inspection by HMCIP:
7–16 March 2012 Unannounced full follow-up inspection
Published: May 2012

Greater clarity of purpose and was much improved overall

They said:
“Stoke Heath, near Market Drayton in Shropshire, is an institution with long-established experience of holding and managing young offenders. Over recent years it has undergone quite dramatic change, with the loss of its juvenile population in April 2011, to be immediately replaced for the first time by adult prisoners. The prison now holds a mixed population of young adults up to the age of 21 and category C adult prisoners.

“ When we last visited we made a number of criticisms of a prison that was not performing well. At this inspection, and despite the disruption that inevitably follows a period of transition, we found a prison that appeared to have greater clarity of purpose, that had managed the process of change well, and that was overall much improved.

“ Stoke Heath was a safer prison. Most prisoners felt safe when they arrived and the number of violent incidents had reduced. A calm atmosphere was evident around the prison. The more mature profile of prisoners clearly helped, but the prison had also been proactive in its application of safer custody procedures and the quality of supervision was generally good. Young adults were, however, more negative in their perceptions of safety. Some effective self-harm prevention measures were in place and incidents of self-harm were not excessive, although the prison had had to deal with the aftermath of two relatively recent self-inflicted deaths. The prison was commendably developing adult safeguarding initiatives with local authorities in a much more advanced way than we normally see.

“ The segregation unit was a reasonable facility with a fair regime and some meaningful work undertaken around reintegration planning. Throughput, however, appeared quite high, as was the use of formal disciplinary procedures. Use of force, in contrast, seemed to be reducing and scrutiny and governance was impressive in its thoroughness.

“ The prison was reasonably clean but standards on the different wings were variable. Access to sufficient prison clothing of decent quality remained problematic. The quality of relationships between staff and prisoners was good and the vast majority of prisoners felt respected by staff.

“ Some elements of the prison’s work promoting diversity was inconsistent and more needed to be done in respect of all the diverse groups, starting with improved consultation arrangements. In general, however, there was good leadership in promoting diversity and progress was evident. There was supportive provision for different faiths, prisoners had confidence in complaints procedures and there was some good health care provision. The quality of the food was also good, despite some negative prisoner perceptions.

“ Least progress had been made in the provision of activity. It was the area where the change to the prison’s population had had the most impact, and it was clear that the prison was still adjusting provision to reflect those changes. During our inspection, at least a quarter of the population were locked in their cells during the working day, and this was worst among the young adult population. There was a shortfall of around 130 activity places, despite the establishment’s status as a training prison. Allocation to activity was poor and many courses had long waiting lists. There was insufficient vocational training, although there were advanced plans to provide more. Despite clear inadequacies, however, the quality of what was on offer was generally good.

“ The prison’s resettlement work was much improved since our last inspection, although strategic management and the effective analysis of need was still catching up with the changes in the population and there was a significant back log of OASys assessments. All prisoners had an offender management supervisor. Quality assurance of offender management work was reasonably good and the approach was properly orientated toward assessing and reducing the risk of offending. Reintegration planning was also reasonably good, as was provision across most of the resettlement pathways.

“ This is an encouraging report. The changes imposed on the prison were quite sudden and the requirement to respond urgent. Stoke Heath has made clear progress and outcomes for prisoners were generally much better than when we last inspected. It was also pleasing to see that the recent changes had not diverted the prison from getting to grips with its problems. It is arguable that the new population profile will be easier to manage and this may bring further opportunities, but it is also the case that we inspected a prison that was now properly focused and well managed, and that had applied new systems and initiatives with energy, application and thoroughness.”

Nick Hardwick May 2012
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons

Click Here to read the full report

Previous Report
by HMCIP: 13 - 17 December 2010 - unannounced short follow-up inspection
Report Dated: February 2011
Published: May 2011

They said:
“Stoke Heath is a young offender institution which, at the time of this unannounced follow up inspection, held both young adults aged 18–21 and young people under 18. The inspection focused only on the younger population. As this report was in preparation, the Youth Justice Board announced the relocation of these young people following the reduction in their numbers in custody across the country and the need to rationalise the juvenile secure estate.

“ The inspection found that provision for young people at Stoke Heath remained reasonably good across the board and, accordingly, this report provides a suitable testament to the success of managers and staff in managing this challenging population. Given the establishment’s change of role, the report makes no recommendations.

“ Stoke Heath remained an essentially safe place for young people. While many did feel fearful on arrival – not helped by unnecessary routine strip- searching on reception – safeguarding arrangements were sound, a robust approach was taken to reducing bullying and there was good care for those at risk of self-harm. However, violent incidents remained a serious problem and, in response, use of force and of segregation by staff was also high.

“ The establishment was a poor design for young people, with overly large units that were hard to control. Accommodation was of variable quality, but access to showers and phones was good. Relationships between staff and young people were positive, supported by an effective personal officer scheme. There was scope to improve the incentives and sanctions scheme to make it a better and fairer means of managing behaviour. Race issues were dealt with well but other aspects of diversity were underdeveloped. Both the chaplaincy and health care provided a good service.

“ Young people spent a reasonable amount of time out of cell, but association was restricted by the need to carefully manage the large numbers on each unit. Education had improved significantly, with many young people gaining some form of accreditation. There was also a range of vocational opportunities. The library remained a very good facility but PE provision had suffered from staff shortages.

“ The strategic management of resettlement remained reasonable and there was increased practical help available to assist young people to plan for their release. There had been a decline in the sentenced population and an increase in the numbers of remanded young people, but the establishment had responded well to this more transient population. Most reintegration services were satisfactory, with good support to address substance misuse and to maintain family ties.

“ With the removal of young people from Stoke Heath, staff and managers can now focus all their energies on a dedicated population of young adults. This essentially positive final report means that the establishment can look back on a successful closing chapter dealing with young people – whom, it is to be hoped, will be as well cared for in the other parts of the juvenile secure estate to which they have now been moved.”

Nick Hardwick February 2011
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons


Michael Spurr, Chief Executive Officer of NOMS said;

"I am pleased that this report recognises the success of staff at Stoke Heath in managing a challenging population and I welcome the assessment that the establishment is safe, with good staff-prisoner relationships and education, and effective resettlement provision. The number of young people under 18 in custody is reducing, leading to a change in the Stoke Heath's role, and the Governor and his staff will continue to work hard with young adults to ensure effective public protection and to reduce the risk of reoffending on release."

Click here to read the full report


Previous Report
by HMCIP: 29 March – 2 April 2010 - Announced inspection

They said:
“Stoke Heath young offenders’ institution is one of only two remaining ‘split sites’, holding both young adults (aged 18 to 21) and young people (aged 15 to 17). This inspection was solely of the provision for young adults. This is an age group about which the Inspectorate has repeatedly expressed concern: that the focus and the resources available are inadequate to meet their needs and risks. This report amply demonstrates that concern. In many key areas, we found that young adults’ access to important activities and opportunities was severely limited.

“ Processes for the reception and support of young adults in the early days of custody were inadequate. They could experience long delays before being located, sometimes late in the evening, on to their accommodation, which was itself poorly maintained. Some risk assessments were of poor quality, and induction was not sufficiently informative. A high proportion of young adults had felt unsafe at Stoke Heath. Though considerable management attention had been given to violence reduction, the strategies and processes were overcomplicated and underused by residential staff. Data was not disaggregated to identify issues specifically affecting young adults. Bad language often went unchallenged, and shouting out of windows was endemic. Safer custody arrangements also needed greater clarity and focus, and the quality of ACCT documents was inconsistent and sometimes poor. There had, however, been noticeable improvements in disciplinary matters: the segregation unit was now well run, with good relationships, and governance of the use of force was effective. The environment was, in general, dirty and uncared-for: this included ingrained food residue on serving trolleys. Relationships between staff and young adults were relatively relaxed, but there was little proactive engagement or challenge, and the personal officer scheme was underused and undermanaged. Work across the diversity strands was developing, but young adults with disabilities and those from black and minority ethnic communities reported poorer experiences of prison life. Diversity was another area that suffered from the failure to disaggregate monitoring data to reveal the experience of young adults. Health care was in general very good, with some high quality mental health provision, though staff shortages impacted badly on the regime for inpatients.

“ There had been an increase in the amount and range of work, training and education available in the establishment, and it was in general better managed and delivered. However, access for young adults was clearly insufficient to meet need. There were only sufficient vocational training places for 20% of the population and the qualifications available were at a relatively low level. This difficulty was compounded by slow allocation procedures, workshop closures, low attendance rates and poor punctuality. We found over a third of young adults locked in their cells during the working day. Though some education achievements were good, discipline in some classes was poor, and learning plans ineffective. PE facilities and training opportunities were good, but access to recreational PE was unduly restricted, and many young adults told us that they could attend only every other week. Association times were limited and exercise was not available daily.

“ There had been no resettlement needs analysis on which to base provision. Offender management of those in scope, about a third of the population, was ineffective, due to the redeployment of key staff. Contact with offender supervisors was insufficient and most young adults had no up-to-date OASys assessment or sentence plan. There was no custody planning for the remaining two-thirds of the population. Public protection arrangements were good. Some of the resettlement pathways, such as accommodation, family support and substance misuse, were well developed, but others, such as finance and debt and offending behaviour work, were not. In general, access to reintegration services depended on self-referral.

“ This is a disappointing report. Outcomes for young adults at Stoke Heath were not sufficiently good in any of our four key areas: safety, respect, purposeful activity and resettlement. It was clear that their needs were much less well catered for than those of the under-18s with whom they shared the site, and that in many cases little would be done to reduce the significant risk of their reoffending. This is partly a management issue for Stoke Heath itself: to ensure that the opportunities that exist are used effectively and young adults are engaged with and supported, both as a group and individually. But split sites like Stoke Heath also show very clearly the relative neglect of this risky and vulnerable group throughout the prison system, compared to the resources and specialist focus on under-18s – since the previous government’s promise to replicate this for 18-21 year olds was never fulfilled. Split sites are gradually being abolished – but that may serve only to disguise the differential treatment that young adults experience, as well as its inevitable consequences.”

Anne Owers June 2010
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons

Click here to read the full report


Independent Monitoring Board

By law every prison and immigration removal centre must have an Independent Monitoring Board. IMBs in prisons derive their responsibilities from the Prison Act 1952 (Section 6). Prison Rules dealing with IMDs are numbers; 74 to 80

IMBs were known as ‘Boards of Visitors’ and are still referred to in the legislation under their old titles, although this is likely to change in the near future.

The Independent Monitoring Board for each establishment is made up of independent and unpaid volunteers from the local area. They monitor the day-to-day life in the establishment and ensure that proper standards of care and decency are maintained. Members have unrestricted access to all areas of the prison at all times and can talk to any prisoner they wish, out of sight and hearing of a members of staff. They visit all areas such as; kitchens, workshops, accommodation blocks, recreation areas, healthcare centre and chaplaincy.

If a prisoner or detainee has an issue that they have been unable to resolve through the usual internal channels, they can place a confidential request to see a member of the IMB. Problems might include concerns over lost property, visits from family or friends, special religious or cultural requirements, or even serious allegations such as bullying. In addition, if something serious happens at the prison, for example a riot or a death in custody, IMB members may be called in to attend and observe the way in which it is handled.

IMB members sample food, can attend adjudications and should visit people held in the segregation unit. They must also be kept informed on such issues as the use of restraints.

The IMB meets regularly, usually once per month, and has an elected Chair and Vice Chair. Members work together as a team to raise any matters of concern and to keep an independent eye on the prison.


CLICK HERE - to read the latest IMB reports for any prison.
Click on the year and then select the prison.

Information in this section has been kindly provided by the individual prison and the Ministry of Justice. This is supplemented with information from various government websites, Inspectorates and IMB reports and specialist departments within the Prison Service, government, and regional assemblies/parliaments.
Some of the data is published retrospectively: IMBs/Visiting Committees publish their reports up to 6 months after the end of the reporting period and at different times throughout the year, HMCIP publish their reports up to 6 months after the inspection. Population and performance figures are the latest published but can be considerably out of date.
Please Note: Information is constantly changing: The information on our website is regularly checked but if you have additional information, or if you believe that any of our information is incorrect or any links appear to fail please click on ‘Contact’, below.
Before acting upon any information you are advised to contact the prison directly to ensure there have been no recent changes.
Last Update: July 2012


Back to Top


Inside Time Latest Issue

Issue : December 2014

Headlines | Mailbag | Poems
Book List | PSI Updates


Back Issues

Back Issues

View backissues and extras

Browse and Search Tools

View headlines by category
Search headlines | All headlines
Search mailbag | All mailbag
Search poems | All poems

December 2014 Headlines
> Treat Prisoners as Human Beings, Not Criminals
> What are prisons for
> A search for any trace of the governmentís Rehabilitation Revolution
> Tell us why you did it?... You must be joking I didnít do it
> Care Act - what does it mean for prisoners
> Doctor Frankenstein and his monster
> Human Rights: truth and lies
> Scapegoating the undeserving poor
> Interview
> The first Miscarriage of Justice
> Month by Month - December 2014
> The 2014 Longford Trust Awards
> Is it all in the mind
> Time
> Learning in prison
> Take your first Steps to Success in 2015
> Spotlight Police and Crime Commissioners
> From over the wall
> Over-tariff IPPs: an appeal for your stories
> Paperwork is the key
> Adjudication - donít let those days count against you
> Insider Dealing
> Christmas Stories
> Christmas Messages
> Christmas Messages

About Us

About insidetime
Editorial Team

InsidePoetry Book

insidepoetry book New! Volume 5 of
insidepoetry book
is now available!

A collection of poems by prisoners of all backgrounds.

Availabe to buy from this site! Volume 1,2,3 and 4 are also still available and you can SAVE by purchasing bundles!

USP Service

USP from Inside Time

The Useful Services for Prisoners scheme from insidetime provides discounts, vouchers and other benefits from USP Group Members for Prisoners, their families and legal advisors. Click the image above to read more about it.


You can subscribe to insidetime Newspaper and get the paper each month delivered to your door!


Advertise your business or solicitors office to a highly defined target audience.

Other Publications

Inside Time has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.


Contact Us

All contact info for the Operations office and the Editorial Team.

Site Map

Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insidetime site.

External Links

We have a number of external websites which you may be interested on our Links Page.

Social Networking


Inside Information


Everything you need to know about visiting people in prison; procedures, opening times, directions etc.

Comprehensive information about each prison regime; lock down times, facilities, healthcare etc.

*NEW* Detailed information about IRC - Immigration Removal Centres.

insideinformation Book

insideinformation book
The insideinformation book

A comprehensive guide to prisons and prison related services, designed and compiled by former prisoners.


Help and Support

Various pages of information for help and support organisations and networks for those in custody as well as recently released. Also information for friends and family.

Grants and Funding

This grants and funding pdf document aims to meet the need of prisoners and ex-offenders for accurate, up to date information on the supplementary funding available to prisoners.

Rules and Regulations

Information on rules & regulations used throughout the prison service.

Glossary of Terms

The Glossary of Prison Related Terms explains what all the acronyms and terms stand for with prison related matters. Includes links to external sites to further explain things.

Fact Sheets

We have produced many Prison Related Fact Sheets inc. Legal Fact Sheets, Parole Fact Sheets and Other related information.


Find a Solicitor

You can search our solicitor database for listings of solicitors in your area that provide the services you require.

Find a Barrister

You can search our barrister database for listings of barristers in your area that provide the services you require.

Address Finder

You can search our address database in many ways to retrieve contact information for all those elusive addresses you need in a hurry.

Prison Law pdf

This document provides details of leading training providers who offer sound professional training.

Other Publications

Inside Information has produced a number of books and publications you can purchase online.

Site Map

Our site map page contains links to all pages on the insideinformation site.

Contact Us

Use the Contact Us Feedback form to send us suggestions, plus our address and phone numbers.



Inside Justice

insidejustice was launched in July 2010 to investigate alleged miscarriages of justice.

Full introduction is on the insidejustice homepage

insidejustice Cases

insidejustice Articles & Reviews

insidejustice Advisory Panel Members

insidejustice Sponsors page

insidejusticecontact details